Apple is fighting for TSMC capacity as Nvidia takes center stage
Summary
TSMC announced a 36% revenue increase to $122 billion, driven by a 48% jump in high‑performance computing (HPC) sales and a 62% rise in Nvidia’s FY 2025 sales, while Apple’s product revenue is projected to grow only 3.6% for the year to Dec 2025. According to Culpium data, Nvidia may have overtaken Apple as TSMC’s largest client in one or two quarters of 2025, and could surpass Apple permanently in 2026. The AI boom is expanding demand for leading‑edge GPU wafers, forcing Apple to compete for fab capacity that once was guaranteed. TSMC’s 2026 capex is expected to reach $52‑56 billion, supporting volume production at its 2 nm (N2) node and upcoming N2P and A16 variants, with A14 slated for 2028. Margin pressure remains low; Q4 gross margin hit 62.3%, higher than if overseas fabs were excluded. Compared with Nvidia and Alphabet, TSMC’s capital intensity (≈33% of revenue) and depreciation (≈45% of cost of revenue) are substantially greater, reflecting its heavy fab investment risk as AI demand may eventually plateau.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
The comments converge on concerns that Apple’s reliance on TSMC and Nvidia’s willingness to pay premium fab prices create supply‑chain vulnerability, especially amid AI‑driven demand and geopolitical risks involving Taiwan. Many express skepticism about the high cost of hardware and perceived monopoly power, urging more diversified or in‑house manufacturing, such as Intel or potential Apple fabs. While some note Apple’s financial capacity to secure capacity, overall sentiment is critical of the current market dynamics, wary of pricing pressure on consumers, and doubtful about long‑term stability without broader fab competition.
Pocket TTS: A high quality TTS that gives your CPU a voice
Summary
Pocket TTS is presented as a high‑quality text‑to‑speech system designed to run efficiently on CPUs. Development is financially supported by the Iliad Group, CMA CGM Group, and Schmidt Sciences, whose contributions are acknowledged. The accompanying visual assets consist of four images: a primary illustration labeled “Kyutai” and three logos representing the Iliad, CMA CGM, and Schmidt Sciences organizations. No further technical specifications or usage details are provided in the excerpt.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
The comments express overall enthusiasm for open‑source text‑to‑speech models like Pocket TTS, noting their good quality, lightweight design, ease of local deployment, and suitability for hobbyist or home‑lab projects. Users highlight successful integrations with agents and plugins, appreciate the low cost and variety of architectures, and see such models as a viable alternative to proprietary voice services. Concerns are raised about occasional synthesis errors, single‑language limitation, and unclear licensing restrictions, but the dominant view is that these tools are promising and increasingly accessible.
Inside The Internet Archive's Infrastructure
Summary
The scraped page contains only headings and a catalog of image alt texts. The primary headline is “The Long Now of the Web: Inside the Internet Archive’s Fight Against Forgetting” (published on HackerNoon). A secondary title, “Gran Turismo 2026: The Great AI Showdown for Autonomous Driving,” appears but no accompanying article body is present. The remainder lists alt‑text labels for various UI icons, language flags, profile pictures, and unrelated article thumbnails (e.g., “A California Engineer’s ‘Rational’ Preparation for Coronavirus,” “Inside a Practitioner Survey on Modern Code Review Priorities,” “Why Data Quality Is Becoming a Core Developer Experience Metric”). No substantive narrative, data, or technical discussion about the Internet Archive’s preservation efforts or autonomous‑driving AI is included in the extracted content.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
Comments express concern over the Internet Archive’s limited mirroring options and the high operating budget, questioning cost efficiency and suggesting competitive funding could lower hardware expenses. Critics note perceived low‑quality, AI‑generated article writing and insufficient technical details such as pricing, deduplication, and visual content. Several remarks reflect nostalgia for the Archive’s earlier infrastructure and praise for recent content additions, while others highlight worries about talent shortages, stagnation, and the uncertain impact of generative AI on the nonprofit’s future.
Linux boxes via SSH: suspended when disconected
Summary
Shellbox provides on‑demand Linux virtual machines accessible solely via SSH. Each instance includes 2 vCPUs, 4 GB RAM and a 50 GB SSD, with a public HTTPS URL and automatic TLS termination. Boxes retain state by pausing on disconnect and resume on reconnection; they stop automatically when the account balance falls below $5. Billing is usage‑based at $0.05 per hour while running and $0.005 per hour while stopped, with prepaid balances, refunds for unused funds, and cost‑control limits. Core CLI commands include `create ` to provision a box, `connect ` to SSH in, `list` to view status and URLs, `billing` for balance and usage details, and `funds ` to add credit. File transfer works via standard `scp`. The service requires no special client or browser plugins, and each box receives a unique public URL.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
The comments show a mixed reaction: many view the pricing as higher than comparable providers and question its practicality without a public IP, while others find the on‑demand, suspend‑when‑idle model intriguing and see potential for cost‑saving dev environments or specialized hardware access. Comparisons to existing services such as Hetzner, DigitalOcean, AWS, and similar platforms are common, and several users request clearer documentation, sign‑up flow, and feature details like storage persistence, SFTP support, and security assurances. Overall interest coexists with skepticism about value and usability.
Briar keeps Iran connected via Bluetooth and Wi-Fi when the internet goes dark
Summary
Briar is an open‑source, peer‑to‑peer messaging application designed for secure, private communication without reliance on centralized servers. It establishes encrypted connections directly between devices or via Tor onion routing, providing anonymity and resistance to censorship. Because Google Play policies block its distribution, Briar is offered through alternative channels such as F‑Droid and direct APK downloads; users must enable “unknown sources” to install.
Key points:
- Uses end‑to‑end encryption and onion services for all messages, files, and status updates.
- Operates even without Internet access by forming local Bluetooth or Wi‑Fi direct links.
- Requires Tor for initial network discovery; if Tor is unavailable, fallback direct connections are used.
- The app size is about 48 MB; updates are delivered via the same distribution methods.
Troubleshooting notes mention that installation may fail on Google Play, and users should verify the source and permissions. The “briar://” URI scheme allows sharing of contacts and groups. Overall, Briar provides decentralized, encrypted messaging suitable for environments with limited or monitored connectivity.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
Comments show a mixed view of Briar. Users note it functions mainly as an emergency, offline text tool, citing poor image quality, unreliable note syncing, slow desktop performance, and limited forum deletion. Some express enthusiasm for the project’s goals, while others seek clarification on its operation and iOS availability. Suggestions appear for alternative mesh solutions, particularly in regions prone to internet shutdowns. Overall sentiment balances appreciation for its privacy intent with criticism of practical usability and feature gaps.
Ask HN: How can we solve the loneliness epidemic?
Community Discussion
Comments emphasize that loneliness is a widespread issue amplified by modern mobility, car‑centric neighborhoods, and pervasive digital distractions. Many suggest proactive personal steps such as regularly initiating meet‑ups, joining volunteer, religious, or hobby‑based groups, and treating friendships like a garden that requires consistent effort. Several contributors argue that individual actions are limited without broader societal incentives or structural changes to encourage community interaction. A recurring view notes rejection sensitivity and past trauma hinder social engagement, while others express skepticism about any lasting solution.
My Gripes with Prolog
Summary
The author lists several perceived shortcomings of Prolog while preparing a book chapter on Answer Set Programming and Logic Constraint Programming. Key issues include: lack of a standardized string type—implementations use atoms, character lists, or custom operators, causing incompatibility; absence of functions, forcing separate predicates and arithmetic expressions (e.g., length/2) and hindering concise expressions; limited built‑in collection types, restricted to lists and compound terms with no native maps or structs; true/false not being values but control‑flow constructs, making boolean handling cumbersome; cuts (!) and negation‑as‑failure (\+) being opaque and error‑prone, especially when used for conditionals or existential quantification; difficulty obtaining all query results without manual backtracking, requiring constructs like bagof/3 with existential quantifiers; ad‑hoc symbolic term conventions (e.g., ^, -) lacking formal definition; and sort/2 returning a set (removing duplicates) instead of a stable list, necessitating extra steps such as keysort/2. The author notes that alternative languages (Picat, ASP) address many of these concerns.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
The comments express a mixed view of Prolog, combining frustration with its perceived quirks and appreciation for its concepts. Critics argue that the language’s control constructs, such as cut and negation, are often misunderstood and can seem unintuitive, especially to newcomers, while acknowledging that these features serve specific purposes. The learning curve and unconventional syntax are cited as obstacles, yet bidirectional reasoning and logical expressiveness generate interest. Suggestions include integrating Prolog‑like capabilities into more familiar languages and exploring alternatives like Picat, reflecting both disappointment and curiosity.
JuiceFS is a distributed POSIX file system built on top of Redis and S3
Summary
JuiceFS is a distributed POSIX‑compatible file system that leverages Redis for metadata management and object storage services such as S3 for data persistence. The project provides a stable release, continuous‑integration workflow status, and Go code quality metrics. Documentation is available in English, and community support is offered via a Slack channel. Architectural diagrams illustrate the system’s design, data‑structure layout, and file storage methodology. Benchmark results are presented for sequential read/write performance and metadata operation latency, demonstrating scalability. Contribution activity is highlighted by a star‑history chart and a list of active maintainers and developers.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
Comments express mixed views on JuiceFS. Many raise concerns about relying on Redis or other volatile metadata stores, demanding stronger durability guarantees and benchmark comparisons with alternatives such as PostgreSQL or database‑free solutions. Experiences of limited performance and data‑loss risk when metadata fails are cited, prompting some teams to abandon the system. Critics note incomplete POSIX semantics and suggest native S3‑compatible designs for large‑scale workloads, while a few acknowledge JuiceFS’s innovation but see it suited mainly for smaller or experimental projects.
Go-legacy-winxp: Compile Golang 1.24 code for Windows XP
Summary
The page titled “GitHub - syncguy/go-legacy-winxp at winxp-compat” displays an access restriction message: “You can’t perform that action at this time.” No additional repository information, code, or documentation is provided. An image placeholder is noted with the alt text “Gopher image,” but the visual content is not available.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
The discussion notes a surprisingly active Windows XP ecosystem, highlighting continued development of security updates, browsers, and third‑party clients. It points out that modern toolchains such as w64devkit can produce recent GCC builds for XP, and mentions projects like a .NET 10 starter targeting the platform. The author questions the difficulty of creating new software for XP and whether such nostalgia‑driven efforts have practical value, expressing curiosity about current feasibility and usefulness.
Data is the only moat
Community Discussion
Comments emphasize that competitive advantage stems from a mix of factors—vertical and horizontal integration, brand reputation, visible storytelling, design simplicity, network effects, regulatory positioning, and execution speed—rather than data alone. Attention is highlighted as the primary moat, with data serving mainly to capture that attention. Opinions are split between optimism about LLM progress and calls for critical evaluation of their limitations. Concerns about aggressive tactics, data ownership, and the need for regulation appear alongside recognition that algorithmic breakthroughs and user‑centric design can foster strong loyalty.