Adoption of EVs tied to real-world reductions in air pollution: study
Summary
A recent study demonstrates that increased adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) correlates with measurable reductions in ambient air pollution levels. Using real‑world emissions data, researchers quantified decreases in pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulate matter (PM2.5) in regions with higher EV penetration, attributing these improvements to the displacement of internal‑combustion‑engine traffic. The analysis controls for confounding factors like weather and industrial activity, reinforcing the causal link between EV usage and cleaner air. Accompanying visual elements on the source page include unrelated photographs: a teacher with an inattentive student, a pregnant woman with water, generic traffic‑related pollution imagery, tobacco‑product packaging, and a family beside an EV charging station at sunset. These images serve illustrative purposes but do not add technical data to the study’s findings.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
The comments express strong support for electric vehicles as a means to improve urban air quality and reduce noise, emphasizing their environmental advantages over internal‑combustion engines. While acknowledging that electricity generation can still involve fossil fuels, they note a shift toward renewable and nuclear sources. Observations from cities with extensive public transit highlight the potential benefits of widespread EV adoption, and diesel trucks are singled out as a significant source of local pollution that EV trucks could replace.
BirdyChat becomes first European chat app that is interoperable with WhatsApp
Summary
BirdyChat is positioned as Europe’s first chat application that interoperates directly with WhatsApp. The service allows users to initiate one‑to‑one conversations with WhatsApp contacts by entering the recipient’s phone number. Communication supports text messages, photos, and file attachments, all transmitted over an encrypted connection to ensure security. BirdyChat permits users to register with a work‑related email address rather than a personal mobile number, enabling a clear distinction between professional and private communications while maintaining continuous availability. The platform’s core features focus on cross‑platform messaging, end‑to‑end encryption, and identity management via corporate email credentials.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
Comments express widespread skepticism toward the new WhatsApp‑BirdyChat interoperability mandated by the DMA. Users note that WhatsApp’s opt‑in approach limits practical reach, raise concerns about privacy, data processing, and end‑to‑end encryption, and criticize the closed‑source, invite‑only nature of BirdyChat. Many favor open, interoperable protocols and fear the arrangement could favor Meta’s ecosystem, increase spam, or create user‑experience issues. While a minority mention potential regulatory benefits or business utility, overall sentiment is doubtful and critical of the implementation.
We X-Rayed a Suspicious FTDI USB Cable
Summary
Eclypsium used an industrial X‑ray system to compare a suspect FTDI USB‑to‑UART cable with a verified authentic cable purchased from DigiKey. The suspect cable exhibited functional failures at higher transfer speeds, prompting analysis. X‑ray inspection revealed several construction differences: the authentic cable showed copper ground pours, ground stapling, decoupling components placed close to the FTDI IC, additional isolation passives on the USB data lines, a thermal pad under the IC, engineered strain‑relief, more solder on the USB‑A connector tabs, a smaller silicon process, and better passive alignment. The questionable cable lacked these features. The study highlights that visual and X‑ray cues can indicate counterfeit hardware, but detection is non‑trivial. Eclypsium stresses that counterfeit components pose broader supply‑chain risks, especially when they involve network gear or servers that may contain hidden backdoors, and urges organizations to prioritize hardware‑level supply‑chain security.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
The comments convey cautious concern about the security risks posed by integrated chips in modern communication cables, especially regarding counterfeit and potentially malicious hardware. While the promotional nature of the story is noted, interest remains in its relevance and technical details. Several contributors discuss personal experimentation with supply‑chain attacks to illustrate hardware‑root‑of‑trust vulnerabilities, and there is consensus that such hidden implants are alarming. A common suggestion is that greater transparency or regulation, such as exposing internal chips, could mitigate these threats.
Postmortem: Our first VLEO satellite mission (with imagery and flight data)
Summary
Albedo’s first satellite, Clarity‑1, launched 14 Mar 2025 on SpaceX Transporter‑13 to demonstrate sustainable very‑low‑Earth‑orbit (VLEO) operations. The mission validated the in‑house Precision bus (TRL‑9) and achieved 98 % of the technology required for 10 cm visible and 2 m thermal‑IR imaging. Key results: drag coefficient 12 % better than target, supporting a projected five‑year lifetime at 275 km; atomic‑oxygen‑resistant solar arrays maintained constant power despite increased AO fluence; controlled 100 km altitude descent with sub‑meter thrust‑planning accuracy; radiation tolerance 4× lower single‑event upsets than expected. The bus performed all subsystems, including CMG‑based attitude control, thermal management, and cloud‑native ground operations with automated contact planning, thrust planning, and 14 on‑orbit software updates (including an FPGA flash). Imaging demonstrated end‑to‑end processing within seconds, line‑scan strips 20‑30 km long, jitter 11× lower than goal, and successful infrared detection with a low‑cost microbolometer. CMG bearing failures limited sustained high‑resolution imaging; the satellite lost TT&C contact after nine months, likely due to memory corruption. VLEO performance data, AO mitigation, and bus design are confirmed, guiding design fixes (lower CMG temperatures, stiffer mirror structure, increased heater capacity) for the next VLEO mission.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
The comments show overall positive reception of the mission write‑up, with congratulations and interest in technical details such as image resolution accuracy, gyro lubricant failure, memory issues, and plans for an image service. Readers ask for deeper engineering post‑mortems, clarification of VLEO benefits, and reasons for proprietary communication buses. Some critique the informal tone of the report, suggesting a more corporate style to appeal to established contractors. Overall, the community is supportive but seeks more rigorous analysis and clarity.
Two Weeks Until Tapeout
Summary
The author submitted a two‑design ASIC to a GlobalFoundries 180 nm experimental Tiny Tapeout shuttle, receiving free tape‑out. The chip contains (1) a custom JTAG TAP for silicon debug and (2) a 2 × 2 systolic array that multiplies 8‑bit signed integer matrices. The project was completed in ten days using the Open‑ROAD/Librelane flow, with stages of architecture, RTL design, Cocotb‑based simulation, FPGA emulation, firmware bring‑up, and ASIC implementation. Constraints include eight input, eight output, and eight configurable pins, an assumed 50 MHz I/O clock, and no SRAM macro (the shuttle’s macro power‑gating was unavailable). Each compute unit implements a Booth‑radix‑4 multiplier with a Wallace‑tree adder, followed by a clamping step to retain 8‑bit results; weights are stored locally in each unit and loaded over four cycles. An array controller reshapes input streams and buffers output to meet I/O limits. Validation employed randomized test vectors across icarus‑verilog and CVC‑timed netlists. The design demonstrates how Tiny Tapeout’s automated flow enables rapid, low‑cost ASIC prototypes despite tight timelines.
Read full article →
Raspberry Pi Drag Race: Pi 1 to Pi 5 – Performance Comparison
Summary
- **Hardware evolution**: Pi 1 (2012) used a 700 MHz ARM1176 core, 512 MB DDR RAM, 100 Mb Ethernet, micro‑USB power (0.7 A). Pi 2 (2015) introduced a quad‑core 900 MHz Cortex‑A7 SOC, 1 GB RAM, two extra USB 2.0 ports, micro‑SD, and 0.8 A power. Pi 3 (2016) upgraded to 64‑bit Cortex‑A53 cores at 1.2 GHz, added Wi‑Fi (2.4 GHz) and Bluetooth 4.1; the 3B+ later raised clock to 1.4 GHz, added Gigabit Ethernet over USB 2.0, dual‑band Wi‑Fi, and 1.34 A power. Pi 4 (2019) employed a BCM2711 with four Cortex‑A72 cores at 1.5 GHz, VideoCore VI GPU, LPDDR4 (1‑8 GB), USB‑C power (1.25 A), two USB 3.0 ports, dual micro‑HDMI, and true Gigabit Ethernet. Pi 5 (2023) uses a BCM2712 with four Cortex‑A76 cores at 2.4 GHz, VideoCore VII GPU (800 MHz), PCIe (NVMe support), 2‑8 GB LPDDR4X, USB‑C power up to 5 A, and a dedicated fan header.
- **Performance tests**: 1080 p YouTube playback is impossible on Pi 1, choppy on Pi 2‑3, acceptable on Pi 4, smooth on Pi 5. Sysbench single‑core scores rise from 68 (Pi 1) to >40 000 (Pi 5), yielding ≈600× speedup over Pi 1; multicore scaling shows similar gains. GLMark2 GPU scores improve from sub‑100 (Pi 1‑3) to >250 (Pi 4) and >600 (Pi 5). Storage bandwidth climbs with bus speed (25 MHz → 100 MHz). iPerf shows Pi 1 below 100 Mbps, Pi 2 meets it, Pi 3 B+ near theoretical USB 2.0 limits, Pi 4‑5 reach Gigabit. Power draw at idle varies <2 W; under load Pi 5 consumes ~3× Pi 1 but delivers ~200× performance per watt.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
Comments highlight the Raspberry Pi 3 as a cost‑effective, low‑power sweet spot, with the 3B offering the best balance of performance and energy use, while the 3A+ and Zero 2 W trade size and power for modest gains. Newer models deliver notable CPU and GPU improvements but bring higher price, power draw, and thermal concerns, prompting comparisons to inexpensive used mini PCs that outperform the Pi 5 in raw speed. The Compute Module 4 is praised for scalability in products, and older Pi units are still valued for lightweight, GPIO‑centric tasks despite limited performance.
Claude Code's new hidden feature: Swarms
Summary
The page contains no substantive title, displaying “[no‑title]” as a placeholder. A brief error notice reads, “Something went wrong, but don’t fret — let’s give it another shot,” indicating a failed load and prompting a retry. The layout includes section headings demarcated by lines, specifically “Images and Visual Content:” followed by an entry for “Image 1.” The only descriptive information for the image is its alt text, which consists solely of a warning emoji (⚠️). No additional textual content, data, or visual elements are present beyond these structural markers and the single alt‑text symbol. Consequently, the document provides only a minimal error message and a placeholder for an image without further context or detail.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
The comments recognize that orchestrating multiple AI agents can produce high‑quality code and be entertaining, but most note significant drawbacks. Users report excessive token costs, code bloat, loss of overall understanding, and difficulty reviewing large outputs. Many argue that current models generate more code than needed and introduce operational risks, so human oversight remains essential. There is cautious optimism that improved models and better tooling could make such “team‑lead” abstractions viable, alongside a desire for broader usage metrics and clearer frameworks.
Draig, a Welsh Programming Language
Summary
L10N::CY is the Welsh localization module for the Raku programming language. The distribution installs a `draig` executable that automatically activates the Welsh locale, and it can also be enabled in specific scripts with a `use L10N::CY` statement. Example usage shown in the synopsis:
```
draig -e 'dywedyd "Helo Byd"'
```
outputs “Helo Byd”. The module requires the environment variable `RAKUDO_RAKUAST=1` to be set. It contains the logic needed to provide Welsh language support throughout Raku. The documentation references “Creating a new programming language – Draig”. Author is Richard Hainsworth ([email protected]). Copyright © 2024‑2025 Raku Localization Team; the library is released under the Artistic License 2.0. Images listed are generic “Actions Status” placeholders.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
The comments express enthusiasm for the project’s educational focus and multilingual potential, noting its appeal to those interested in similar tools such as Hedy. Several contributors show interest in further development, including a desire for a Raku implementation and curiosity about specific syntax choices. One comment references a detailed “how‑to” guide from the developer, while another raises the broader pedagogical question of teaching children programming in their native language. Overall, the tone is supportive and inquisitive about future expansions.
How I estimate work
Summary
Software engineering estimation is fundamentally unreliable because most work involves unknown problems that dominate effort. Small, well‑defined tasks (e.g., a simple deployment) can be timed accurately, but large‑scale changes require research, system exploration, and architectural decisions that cannot be quantified beforehand. Estimates are therefore not generated by engineers to aid execution; they serve as political tools for managers, VPs, and executives to allocate resources, set expectations, and decide which projects proceed. In practice, managers often arrive with a desired timeline and force teams to fit a solution within that constraint, reversing the usual “estimate‑then‑plan” flow. Effective estimation, according to the author, involves gathering political context, assessing risk, and presenting multiple feasible approaches—each tied to the given time frame—rather than a single fixed duration. When a project is genuinely impossible, a team can signal this, but only if prior trust exists. The post emphasizes that estimation should focus on unknowns, provide ranges with associated risks, and be used as a negotiation aid, not a precise forecast.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
Comments converge on the view that software estimation is inherently uncertain and heavily influenced by political and business pressures. Most contributors stress breaking work into small, well‑defined units, using historical data, confidence intervals, or story‑point planning to improve reliability, while acknowledging unknown‑unknowns and team skill variability. Many describe estimates as negotiation tools that shape scope, deadlines, and resource allocation, often serving non‑technical stakeholders more than engineering. A minority argue that similar‑type tasks can be estimated with reasonable accuracy, but overall consensus holds that estimates remain approximations requiring continual adjustment and clear communication.
High-bandwidth flash progress and future
Summary
Professor Kim Jung‑ho of KAIST projected that the high‑bandwidth flash (HBF) market could surpass high‑bandwidth memory (HBM) by 2038, with Samsung and SanDisk aiming to integrate HBF into Nvidia, AMD, and Google products by late 2027‑early 2028. He described a three‑tier memory hierarchy: HBM as a fast GPU cache, a 512 GB HBF layer delivering 1.638 TB/s, and higher‑capacity networked SSD storage accessed via BlueField‑4. A 512 GB HBF chip would require stacking two 2‑Tb (250 GB) 3D NAND dies, totaling 642 NAND layers across six strings, fabricated with through‑silicon vias (TSVs) or plugs that pass through lower stacks, increasing die area. SK Hynix is developing AIN‑BNAND HBF products, showing a base/logic die on an interposer with NAND core layers above; SanDisk presents similar TSV‑based stacks. Prototypes are expected from SK Hynix (later this month) and Kioxia (5 TB PCIe Gen 6 x8 module). Samsung has joined a consortium with MOUs; Micron, Nvidia, and AMD have not yet announced HBF plans.
Read full article →
Community Discussion
The discussion highlights strong enthusiasm for high‑bandwidth flash, viewing the expansion from a few to potentially hundreds of channels as a significant technological advance. Simultaneously, there are concerns about NAND flash’s limited write‑cycle endurance, especially if extensive context writes become common. The comments also note a recent sharp rise in NVMe flash prices, attributing it to AI hyperscalers’ heavy consumption of both memory and SSD wafer supplies, suggesting market pressure and supply constraints are influencing cost.